I’ve been putting together a short presentation tonight for a team effort on Thursday. One of my prof’s (and research advisor) at UOIT asked me to join him and a few others in his final day presentation to the Faculty of Education grads as they get ready to leave university and head off to the wild blue yonder.
The guiding questions for this session will be the role of research in education. Specifically, I’m going to be speaking of the research I’m currently working on. My Ethics Board application went in last week. (It’s hard to type with your fingers crossed BTW.) My guiding topic is around the use of technologies, particularly mobile technologies, by educators and how their personal use may or may not be related to their professional use. I’m going to draw some parallels between what I’ve learned, what I hope to learn in the research and how it’s impacted my daily work as an educator. But thinking about this has gotten me to pondering the larger pictures. (It usually does.)
So what role does educational research play in the day to day workings of a typical classroom?
In thinking about this, I have to say that over the last <cough, cough> years I’ve been in education that my answer would have changed. I can recall when I first started teaching, and the ‘next new thing’ would be introduced at a meeting or PD day and I’d roll my eyes and wonder what bush they had just crawled out from under. There’s no way that this this would work in MY classroom. Etc.. etc…
Fast forward a decade (or more) and I have started to take a longer view of educational research. I see that most of the ‘new’ things that are now hitting the classroom, are things that have been talked about and researched quite extensively for many years. In some cases, many decades. And I think that the role of a clued-in educator is to understand, in a practical way, how to deal with it all. There is still a theory-practice disconnect. Often you’ll hear that teachers blame the ‘ivory tower’ of acadmia with being out of touch, and then the academics turn around and blame the stagnacy of the system and the lack of change on the inertia of the teaching profession.
I suspect that the truth lay somewhere in the middle, and that there needs to be a close relationship between the two ends of the spectrum. To provide some evidence, lets look at two of the latest things to come ‘down the pipe’.
Growing Success
The Ontario Ministry of Education has recently released a new document on assessment and evaluation called Growing Success. This document is meant to shape policy and how students are assessed and evaluated in our classrooms. There’s been some mighty interesting discussion around staff rooms across the province. (Ask someone about the definition of homework. Go on. I dare you.)
But here’s the thing. That document reflects some solid thinking and research based writing by some great educational thinkers. Folks like Damian Cooper and Alfie Kohn have had a huge influence on this. And they’ve been researching this for decades. Nothing new to see here.
Professional Learning Communities
The current move in professional learning is around professional learning communities. This has been ongoing in elementary for a few years, and is now being implemented in secondary schools across the province. When it first rolled out, there was lots of misunderstandings around what it could look like, and what the goals of PLC’s were. There was lots of ‘this too shall pass’ conversations around. But here’s the thing, this has a strong research base by folks like Michael Fullan and folks like him. But in my opinion, it’s nothing new. If you asked teachers (which I did) what would YOU like to most do to learn in a professional capacity, guess what I heard? ‘I want time. Time to sit with my colleagues and work on things with them. To learn with and from on another about practical strategies and classroom ideas.’
Huh. Guess what PLCs are for?
Ohhhh. I see.
When framed that way, you get more interest in the process then. It’s what folks often want, and it’s backed by research. Go figure.
So what’s all this boil down to? In my opinion, we, as educators, need to be aware of the research. Not necessarily the latest journals and the nitty gritty of experimental and quasi-experimental studies, but the meta-analysis. The Big Ideas if you will. Because the people we work for sure are aware of it, and they are trying to implement some of it in our schools and classes. I’ll be the first to admit that implementation (practical) does not always look like it did on paper (theory). But if we have an understanding of both, we can find the good in all of it, and put these things in place for the betterment of both the students and the teachers.
Not a bad thing.
Powered by Qumana